------- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2009-09-17 11:08 -------
(In reply to comment #2)

> According to these rules, your asm should be written as:
> 
>   asm ("fmulp": "=t" (ret): "0" (ret), "u" (tmp): "st(1)");

So, invalid.


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15319

Reply via email to