------- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-17 11:08 ------- (In reply to comment #2)
> According to these rules, your asm should be written as: > > asm ("fmulp": "=t" (ret): "0" (ret), "u" (tmp): "st(1)"); So, invalid. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15319