------- Comment #7 from dean at arctic dot org 2009-09-17 11:06 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Without accounting for the push/pop in CFI you will not be able to accurately > process asynchronous unwind events. >
just to be sure i understand -- you're saying a %rsp modification in a binary which requires unwind information is not a space savings. that's fine with me, but not all binaries have unwind information. -dean -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32803
