------- Comment #4 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-15 12:52 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I think it's the same issue for PR41357. >
*This* is PR41357; you must mean PR41308. Yes, I think so, I'll mark it as a dup of this one. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41357
