------- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 17:09 ------- Hmm, I seem to have approved that patch. I agree with you: I can't see why the specfile change requires ecjx.cc.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
------- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 17:09 ------- Hmm, I seem to have approved that patch. I agree with you: I can't see why the specfile change requires ecjx.cc.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868