------- Comment #5 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-29 12:33 -------
This bug is reasoned by ix86_expand_epilogue. At one place frame.padding0
wasn't added to pro_epilogue_adjust_stack.
Following patch fixes this. It has to applied to 4.4 branch, too.
I'll post it to ML
Index: gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.orig/gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2009-08-27 15:04:03.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2009-08-29 14:24:32.750680900 +0200
@@ -8949,7 +8949,7 @@
frame.to_allocate, red_offset,
style == 2);
pro_epilogue_adjust_stack (stack_pointer_rtx, stack_pointer_rtx,
- GEN_INT (frame.nsseregs * 16),
+ GEN_INT (frame.nsseregs * 16 +
frame.padding0),
style, false);
}
else if (frame.to_allocate || frame.nsseregs)
--
ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-08-29 12:33:43
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41184
