------- Comment #17 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2009-08-27 21:59 -------
Created an attachment (id=18439)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18439&action=view)
reduced test without any subroutine

I have attached a reduced test without any subroutine. It requires the same
input as air.f90, but do not expect meaningful results. As such I get:

[ibook-dhum] lin/test% gfc -m64 -O2 -funsafe-math-optimizations air_db.f90
[ibook-dhum] lin/test% time a.out > /dev/null
4.306u 0.015s 0:04.32 99.7%     0+0k 0+1io 0pf+0w

If I comment line 94

         WRITE (6,*) i , spx(i) , epx(i) , NPX(i)

I get

[ibook-dhum] lin/test% gfc -m64 -O2 -funsafe-math-optimizations air_db.f90
[ibook-dhum] lin/test% time a.out > /dev/null
6.464u 0.020s 0:06.49 99.8%     0+0k 0+2io 0pf+0w

Among the weirdness of this pr, if I comment also the line 502

      WRITE (7,*) MXPx , MXPy

I get

[ibook-dhum] lin/test% gfc -m64 -O2 -funsafe-math-optimizations air_db.f90
[ibook-dhum] lin/test% time a.out > /dev/null
4.273u 0.014s 0:04.29 99.7%     0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40106

Reply via email to