------- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-20 12:07 ------- I went checking my logs in more detail. I believe revision 150854 is fine (so sorry, my previous guess was wrong), while 150940 fails for me. That would leave three more revs from the FE:
r150856 | domob | 2009-08-17 20:55:30 +0200 (Mon, 17 Aug 2009) | 14 lines 2009-08-17 Daniel Kraft <d...@domob.eu> r150858 | pault | 2009-08-17 22:17:12 +0200 (Mon, 17 Aug 2009) | 13 lines 2008-08-17 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> r150875 | janus | 2009-08-18 16:23:35 +0200 (Tue, 18 Aug 2009) | 16 lines 2009-08-18 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> but I don't dare to guess this time :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41126