------- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2009-08-20 12:07 -------
I went checking my logs in more detail. I believe revision 150854 is fine (so
sorry, my previous guess was wrong), while 150940 fails for me. That would
leave three more revs from the FE:

r150856 | domob | 2009-08-17 20:55:30 +0200 (Mon, 17 Aug 2009) | 14 lines

2009-08-17  Daniel Kraft  <d...@domob.eu>

r150858 | pault | 2009-08-17 22:17:12 +0200 (Mon, 17 Aug 2009) | 13 lines

2008-08-17  Paul Thomas  <pa...@gcc.gnu.org>

r150875 | janus | 2009-08-18 16:23:35 +0200 (Tue, 18 Aug 2009) | 16 lines

2009-08-18  Janus Weil  <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>
            Paul Thomas  <pa...@gcc.gnu.org>

but I don't dare to guess this time :-)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41126

Reply via email to