------- Comment #3 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-08-05 16:40 ------- &c.f isn't even valid, it should be &C::f
I didn't check the code, but that message isn't used for member variables or nested types, so if it does only apply to member functions then I think changing '&' to '()' unconditionally makes sense. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31423
