------- Comment #21 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-27 09:34
-------
Thanks Jason. I'm tentatively recategorizing as libstdc++, then. In general,
I'm not at all sure what we should do about it, however, now that Concepts are
gone. I don't think we can hope to avoid, here and elsewhere, all the typical
problems caused by unconstrained templates. Certainly, having the two separate
overloads:
template<typename InputIterator, typename Distance>
InputIterator next(InputIterator, Distance);
template<typename InputIterator>
InputIterator next(InputIterator);
would lead to cleaner error messages in case of ambiguities, but I'm not sure
we can in general achieve much more than this.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c++ |libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40497
