------- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-24 14:16
-------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Revision 149750 failed
> 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > ------- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-23 19:16
> > -------
> > This patch:
> >
> > Index: cp-gimplify.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- cp-gimplify.c (revision 149933)
> > +++ cp-gimplify.c (working copy)
> > @@ -804,15 +804,6 @@ cp_genericize_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - else if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == BIND_EXPR)
> > - {
> > - VEC_safe_push (tree, heap, wtd->bind_expr_stack, stmt);
> > - cp_walk_tree (&BIND_EXPR_BODY (stmt),
> > - cp_genericize_r, data, NULL);
> > - VEC_pop (tree, wtd->bind_expr_stack);
> > - *walk_subtrees = 0;
> > - }
> > -
> > else if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == USING_STMT)
> > {
> > tree block = NULL_TREE;
> >
> > fixed the problem. Does it make any senses?
>
> Not really. It will break debug information for using declarations.
>
> If you add cp_walk_trees to BIND_EXPR_VARS and/or BIND_EXPR_BLOCK
> does that fix it?
>
> Richard.
>
I tried
Index: cp-gimplify.c
===================================================================
--- cp-gimplify.c (revision 149933)
+++ cp-gimplify.c (working copy)
@@ -807,6 +807,10 @@ cp_genericize_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk
else if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == BIND_EXPR)
{
VEC_safe_push (tree, heap, wtd->bind_expr_stack, stmt);
+ cp_walk_tree (&BIND_EXPR_VARS (stmt),
+ cp_genericize_r, data, NULL);
+ cp_walk_tree (&BIND_EXPR_BLOCK (stmt),
+ cp_genericize_r, data, NULL);
cp_walk_tree (&BIND_EXPR_BODY (stmt),
cp_genericize_r, data, NULL);
VEC_pop (tree, wtd->bind_expr_stack);
It doesn't help.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40834
