------- Comment #14 from xenofears at gmail dot com 2009-07-20 22:11 ------- Subject: Re: Libstdc++ is broken for win64 host
I have (unintentionally, you have my apologies,) exaggerated, it hasn't been a couple of weeks, time seems to have moved faster than it did. 20090620 is the last I actually used, so that isn't very helpful, that was quite a bit prior to any problems. If I read my records correctly, 149445 was the last that built successfully, and 149619 is when it didn't. I can't be positive about the last that built successfully, I am sorry. 149619 was definitely the first SVN revision I have used that didn't build libstdc++ correctly. Thanks for your help! I am going to build from a fresh SVN pull and see if anything has fixed, as asked, and to help. -------------------------------------------------- From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 5:52 PM To: <xenofe...@gmail.com> Subject: [Bug target/40802] Libstdc++ is broken for win64 host > > > ------- Comment #13 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-20 > 21:52 ------- > > Hi Peter! You say that this is broken as of rev 149763, which is a commit > from > July 17, 2009. Here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-07/msg00645.html > > But you also indicate that this has been broken for some time before this > specific revision ("it has lasted a couple of weeks"). Can you please > detail > the last revision where this worked for you? That will help us work > through > this issue. > > From your error, type_traits:185:62: > > /// is_standard_layout > template<typename _Tp> > struct is_standard_layout > : public integral_constant<bool, __is_standard_layout(_Tp)> // <-HERE > { }; > > > The likely cause is trying to compile rev 149763 of libstdc++ with an > earlier > version of g++. (ie comment #11) > > So, best bet would be to try to re-build with current trunk, with the > gcc/gcc > and gcc/libstdc++-v3 directories in sync. (Just update all the gcc sources > to > the same rev.) > > If that doesn't work, try to backtrack to a known previous version that > worked, > and send that info, and we can try to solve it. > > best, > benjamin > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40802 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40802
