------- Comment #2 from MSHojatoleslami at Gmail dot com 2009-07-06 17:19
-------
Thanks for your answer.
But there is no need to copy them always as you know:
// ---------- begin
#include <iostream>
class A
{
public :
A (int i)
{
std::cout << "Copy constructor is not used." << std::endl;
}
};
int main ()
{
auto a1 = A (5); // Straight Construction
A a2[3] = { A (0), A (1), A (2) }; // Straight Construction
}
// ---------- end
So, why copy constructor needed to be public, although it's not used!?
Excuse me, If i insist on it. Because i really don't know why it's not a bug,
Specially for "auto" keyword.
There is XFC classes (XFC toolkit that wraps Gtk+) that their copy constructors
are private for some reason, and now, there is no way to use "auto" keyword to
initialize them. Instead, i must to initialize them with the old ways of
standard C++03.
--
MSHojatoleslami at Gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40655
