------- Comment #9 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 18:59 ------- Subject: Re: DWARF for inlined subroutines refers to the outlined copy
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:13:16PM -0000, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Weird, the difference I get with the patch on the testcase at -O2 -g is > attached. You're right, my test run was foobar. Your patch causes this: -arg1 = 0 -(gdb) PASS: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info args above bar (2) +arg1 = <value optimized out> +(gdb) FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info args above bar (2) Despite the appearance, this is good. The previous result was luck, a DW_AT_location in the out-of-line instance that used the same register as in the inlined instance. I hope VTA will fix this failure. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40573
