------- Comment #2 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-15 12:06
-------
8.3.5p5? is that reference right?
and I assume you mean line 10, not line 14.
The pair(pair&&) constructor is not in the WP. Commenting it out causes the
pair(pair<U,V>&&) constructor to be used, which fails to compile (as with the
next line.)
--
jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot
| |com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434
