------- Comment #8 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2009-06-09 18:17 -------
Subject: Re: CLooG header files are not -Wc++-compat
ready
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:42, joseph at codesourcery dot
com<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think you should allow more time for people to update after preparing a
> fixed tarball for the infrastructure directory; won't this have broken
> bootstrap for everyone using any existing cloog-ppl release tarball (as
> referenced in install.texi on trunk)?
Yes, this would break the bootstrap unless you update the cloog sources
from cloog-ppl git. I will revert this patch.
Sebastian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40103