------- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-06 15:49 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Revision 148211 caused a lot of failures in the vect test suite.
> It might be that i686 should be added to > check_effective_target_vect_hw_misalign. It does, but I still have 9 extra failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vector alignment may not be reachable" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "not vectorized: unsupported unaligned store" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-58.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-58.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-88.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-88.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-66.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-66.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 Thanks for the patch. Dominique -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40359
