------- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-04-27 17:33 -------
Dick Hendrickson answered (see link above):

'It's scattered around, but the PAD= is the thing you want.
 In internal I/O it says it acts as if there were an OPEN
 without a PAD= specifier.  In the OPEN section it says the
 default for no PAD= is YES.  In 9.5.3.4.2 it finally says
 "During advancing input when the pad mode has the value YES,
 blank characters are supplied by the processor if the input
 list and format specification require more characters from the record
 than the record contains."

 So, the processor should supply extra blanks as needed.'

 * * *

Ceterum autem censeo ...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39587

Reply via email to