------- Comment #16 from d at teklibre dot com 2009-04-22 18:30 ------- @Jakub/Andrew:
max_recog_operands = MIN(FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER*2,SOME_SANE_VALUE_DERIVED_FROM_SMASHING_THE_STACK_ON_IA64) ; // ? I certainly am not in a position to make a one line change to gcc and test it on ia64 or other insane architectures like vmx,intel avx, etc, etc... I also somehow doubt that a human could deal with 668 registers (a code generator might) this human, at least, copes with 32 registers just fine. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39847
