------- Comment #24 from jason at redhat dot com 2009-04-06 15:32 ------- Subject: Re: deep typedef substitution in error message
dave at boostpro dot com wrote: > I'm confused as to why you think you need to give a still-dependent > type in the signature Because the signature we're printing is the signature of the template, not the specialization. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25185
