------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-16 17:02 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Reopening because
> int params; __asm__ ("xxx" : "=X" (params));
> and
> int params[1]; __asm__ ("xxx" : "=X" (params[0]));
> still produce different output in a way that is undocumented.
How so? "=X" (params[0]) says it can be in memory which means params is
addressable. This is documented as "=X" really means "=rfm" (plus extra
constraints which don't correspond to r, f, or m).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39375
