------- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-14 09:58 ------- There is no reason at all why this cannot be fixed.
Adding non-standard on non-standard doesn't seem too bad:-) Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38273
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:58:41 -0700
------- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-14 09:58 ------- There is no reason at all why this cannot be fixed.
Adding non-standard on non-standard doesn't seem too bad:-) Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38273