------- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-03-13 09:43 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The bug is in both 4.3.3 and 4.3.2, however it isn't in 4.3.0 on a > sparcv9-sun-solaris2.10 box with 64bits. Haven't got any 4.3.1 to try.
Ok. I went through the change which went in *the library* between 4.3.0 and 4.3.2 and indeed, it seems extremely unlikely that the regression has been caused by a library change. Thus, it seems a C++ front-end change. > If 4.4.0 is out before 4.3.4 (if there is such a thing), it might not really > not be worth it, otoh it does seem to be a regression within the 4.3 line... I see. I think 4.4.0 will be out before 4.3.4, actually, I'm not even sure there will be a 4.3.4... In any case, if we want to attempt something here, we badly need a short, reduced, pure C++ testcase, no includes... Anybody volunteering? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39405
