------- Comment #14 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-12 19:05 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Revision 144098 breaks
416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006> The patch is obviously okay, but it seems weird that this is accepted. > I must be missing something on peephole2... By obviously okay I don't mean that it should not be approved by a maintainer. In fact, I wonder if the peephole2 shouldn't even be restricted to GENERAL_REGNO_P. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39152
