------- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-09 20:49 -------
This is wrong, this is not a dup of PR16331. PR16331 is invalid, it makes a
call with r8 in scope. This one doesn't. That's pretty substantial
difference.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org,
| |drepper at redhat dot com
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39139
