------- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-13 21:13 ------- > I intend to change this, conditional on perhaps -ffast-math and/or -pedantic,
I don't understand the "and/or": -ffast-math and -pedantic at the same time does not make any sense for me, -ffast-math allows some sloppiness with respect to the standard, while -pedantic does not. > You can use A**I directly if you want to accept negative values. I have never said that (-2.0)**2.0 is in my coding style. My point is that a pedantic implementation triggers too many bug reports and are not worth the time spent on it (see -2**31). I agree with comment#0 "gfortran should print a diagnostic for -std=f95/f2003/f2008", but not without -std=*. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38823
