------- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-01-13 16:39 ------- Subject: Re: Incorrect memory access type used used in accessing bitfields
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, frikkie at zitera dot co dot za wrote: > I've submitted patches to bug report 23623 > (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623) > that corrects the behavior described in this bug report. If you wish patches submitted to receive any attention, you need to follow the patch submission procedures described at <http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html>. Closed bugs, such as the one you've attached the patches to, receive no attention. If you can demonstrate there are problems not fixed by the patch that fixed the closed bug, you should open a new bug with a testcase that shows how it differs from the closed bug, but the patches should still go to gcc-patches as described. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27628