------- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 06:07 ------- Reply to comments 16 and 17 which I did not see before my commit. Please make sure the original r143102 is in place when you apply latest patch. It does seem bothersome that the xplor-nih is so sensitive. It is largely due to depending on error conditions.
I don't think we want to jump to Daniels patch until we understand what's wrong here. Regardless, I will need a reduced test case to go further. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38772
