------- Comment #2 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2009-01-09 18:21 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> rep ret isn't bogus, please see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg02117.html
>
Thank you, I didn't know (or forgot) AMD recommends this. Hopefully the "rep
retn" opcode won't have any special meaning, as "rep addps" (== addss) has, in
the future. (doubtfully Intel would like to break all gcc-generated binaries by
doing that) Sorry for this report.
--
zsojka at seznam dot cz changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38787
