------- Comment #5 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com  2008-12-23 17:51 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38564 ***

I'm not completely sure about this: the original code was
fine at -O2 on x86_64 and failed at -O3 on the same machine.

#38564 did not use -O3, but did use only -O2.

Given that tree-ssa-pre.c:3131 is some sort of assert,
I speculate that this bug report is causing an assert
fail in the same place, but perhaps for a slightly different reason.

Indeed, there may even be a case for splitting up the assert
expression to make more clear what's failing.

Guidance sought.


-- 

dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38608

Reply via email to