------- Comment #4 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 13:53 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The patch in comment #2 fixes the ICE without regression on > i686-apple-darwin9. I didn't expect any regression with that patch. However, I wonder whether we are not missing something.
For example, I tried to adapt the testcase in PR 33295 to the c_funloc case. The resulting program is rejected with the following error: Error: Can't convert TYPE(_gfortran_iso_c_binding_c_funptr) to TYPE(c_funptr) at (1) The question is: Is it valid/Do we want to support this? module a use iso_c_binding, only:c_funptr end module a module b use iso_c_binding, only:c_funloc!,c_funptr end module b module f contains subroutine g() bind(c) end subroutine end module f program c use b use a use f implicit none type (c_funptr) :: d d = c_funloc (g) end -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37829
