------- Comment #3 from sabre at nondot dot org 2008-12-06 21:31 ------- Ok, so this is a special case when __builtin_constant_p is immediately the operand of "?:"? Do you allow things like __builtin_constant_p(...)+0 as the operand?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38377
