I think this bug is invalid since the type can change via a placement
new which will change the vtable.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2008, at 4:09 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30
12:09 -------
Note that we also do not CSE OBJ_TYPE_REF trees which seem to be
valid gimple
in place of the call in GIMPLE_CALLs so they do not get a separate
value-number.
(not that we would do anything useful with them if they were
standalone,
testcase for that welcome)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35560
