------- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-11-23 22:39 -------
With the following changes:
Only in ../_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/: array_memset_2.f90
Only in gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/: array_setmem_2.f90
--- ../_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr37243.f 2008-09-04
19:10:20.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr37243.f 2008-11-23 22:54:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
IF (J .GT. N) GO TO 320
DO 240 K = 1,N
240 V(K,I) = ZERO
- CALL DAXPY(N,DUM,V(1,II),1,V(1,I),1)
+ CALL DAXPY(N,DUM,V(1,I),1,V(1,I),1)
260 CONTINUE
DUMI = ZERO
DO 280 K = 1,N
--- ../_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f 2007-11-07
10:25:55.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f 2008-11-23 22:53:37.000000000
+0100
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
double precision function dnrm2 ( n, dx, incx)
integer i, incx, ix, j, n, next
- double precision dx(1), cutlo, cuthi, hitest, sum, xmax,zero,one
+ double precision dx(n), cutlo, cuthi, hitest, sum, xmax,zero,one
data zero, one /0.0d0, 1.0d0/
data cutlo, cuthi / 8.232d-11, 1.304d19 /
j = 0
I only get the following failures with -fbounds-check:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_13.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_13.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_13.f90 -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_13.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_13.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_13.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_13.f90 -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_13.f90 -Os execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times ldist "distributed:
split to 4 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ltrans-7.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times ltrans "transformed
loop" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f -O scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "[0-9] \* " 22
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-3.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of
access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-3.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing
an unaligned access" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1
loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of
access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing
an unaligned access" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr19049.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "complicated
access pattern" 1
So, but for pr36091, the failures are expected regexps changed by
-fbounds-check which is not too surprising.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766
