------- Comment #24 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-21 01:28 ------- For the libstdc++ tests, which are the original focus of this PR, is it enough to provide dg-timeout and dg-timeout-factor and either leave the 600 default, or else take the larger of that and [target_info gcc,timeout]?
By the way, dg-timeout-factor from my latest patch takes a floating-point value so it can be used to limit the time used for a known hanging test as well as enabling long-running tests to complete. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28870
