------- Comment #16 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-01 18:48 ------- (In reply to comment #15) > But the second patch is also not correct...
I don't see why. > If run test in the second attachment, in the second testcase(falsename - > "false", "truename" - true, input - "false") eofbit flag won't be set(it is > right). But in the third testcase(input is "true") implementation set eofbit > flag. Your testcase passes, three PASS in the output. > Problem is that __lim cannot be used as stopper for the cycle, because target > sequences have different lenght. Indeed, the other tests at the end of the for trigger in that case (different lengths). > Later I'll try to write more presize test, and may try to write patch. Yes, we need a testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37958
