------- Comment #3 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-31 17:52 -------
The test-case in the bug description leads to bogus warnings in the
second run of the VRP pass. Yesterday me and Richi discussed the
possibility of simply not-giving out any warnings in the second runs
(as opposed to the first which would still generate the warnings it
does).
However, I have managed to modify the test case so that bogus warnings
are spitted out in the first run and so this workaround would not
really solve the problem:
extern int printf (__const char *__restrict __format, ...);
static int f3(int v)
{
int i,j = 0;
for (i = 0; i <= v; i++)
j++;
return j;
}
static int f2(char formatstr[10][100]) {
printf( "%d %s\n", 0, formatstr[f3(0)] );
printf( "%d %s\n", 1, formatstr[f3(1)] );
printf( "%d %s\n", 2, formatstr[f3(2)] );
printf( "%d %s\n", 3, formatstr[f3(3)] );
return 3;
}
static char formatstr[10][100];
int main( void ) {
int anz;
anz = f2(formatstr);
printf( " %d\n",anz);
return 0;
}
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37861
