------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-11 11:11 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > In the original post I wrote: > > Between revisions 140923 and 140951 the following (invalid) code:
I had not read the mailing list when I reading this PR. (See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-10/msg00066.html ) And Thomas' bug report gave a completely different impression. > > Since the code is invalid (d = matmul...), gfortran is indeed allowed to do > > whatever is happening, but I'ld like to understand the new behavior > > and be sure that it cannot happen for valid codes. I think it only gets triggered due to the overwritten memory. > Note 1: I think the error message with -fbounds-check is misleading: > Note3: I think the same misleading error message happens for mat-2.f90 in OK. I changed the bug summary and reopened the bug. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Keywords| |diagnostic Resolution|INVALID | Summary|[4.4 Regression] array |Improve wording for matmul |descriptors for matmul |bound checking |messed up? | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37802
