Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 3, 2008, at 11:10 AM, "mrs at apple dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
In:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-October/017449.html
we were discussing possible bugs in g++ scoping for if statements.
$ cat t.cc
void foo() {
if (int x = 0) {
int x;
}
}
This is invalid C++ but it is valid C99. There is already a duplicated
bug filed for this too but I am too lazy right now to find it.
$ ./xgcc -B./ -c t.cc
$
they expected this to produce a redeclaration error on the inner
declaration
for X.
Tested on gcc version 4.4.0 20081003 (experimental) [trunk revision
140855]
(GCC)
There were other concerns about for, but, others seem to think gcc
does the
right thing with them.
--
Summary: if scoping for declarations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mrs at apple dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37728
