------- Comment #1 from kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com 2008-09-04 19:12 ------- The vendor extension mangling was based on the following email as feedback on the original patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg01622.html The original suggested mangling was: char16_t -> k char32_t -> q I believe that there was some potential contention on using 'q' due to another proposal requesting that same symbol. Is there any information from the ABI committee on which symbols can be used for the mangling of these two types? -- kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kris dot van dot hees at | |oracle dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37376
