------- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-08-30 14:25 ------- Subject: Re: Trouble with some (C99?) math builtins and namespace std
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-29 18:46 > ------- > FWIW, this kind of contortion appear to work, but really I'd rather prefer not > using it... So from the previous replies I gather that if one adds a symbol to the std:: namespace the new additions are not mangled if their unmangled name is used by a GNU extension? For what reason? At least I would miss a warning here that atanh is re-declared in a different namespace or so. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37276
