------- Comment #15 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2008-08-22 11:48 -------
> I don't think this has anything to do with your patch.

Unfortunately it has (at least on i686-apple-darwin9). Reverting the patch for
gcc/varasm.c I have bootstrapped without any problem and the good news it that
the remaining patch fixes:

FAIL: gcc.dg/darwin-weakimport-2.c scan-assembler weak_reference _foo

and

FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ \\t]*[ \\t]_?j
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-12.c scan-assembler weak[^ \\t]*[ \\t]_?foo
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \\t]*[ \\t]_?ffoo1a
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \\t]*[ \\t]_?ffoo1b
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \\t]*[ \\t]_?ffoo1c
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \\t]*[ \\t]_?ffoo1e
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \\t]*[ \\t]_?vfoo1a
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \\t]*[ \\t]_?vfoo1b
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \\t]*[ \\t]_?vfoo1c

but not

FAIL: gcc.dg/darwin-weakimport-1.c scan-assembler weak_reference _a


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170

Reply via email to