------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-21 23:02 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > It works if -g is omitted on the assembling step. Still, the debug information > from the asm should not conflict with the original debug information, should > it?
And at that point, this is not a GCC bug but rather a binutils one or a gdb one. binutils contains the assembler. So I am going to close this as invalid. GCC is doing the correct thing of passing -g down the assembler since you asked for it. The assembler might be doing the incorrect thing but that is not GCC's fault. Report it to the binutils team (as I mentioned they just fixed it recently, http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-08/msg00036.html). -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37196
