------- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-08-04 21:13 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] member function pointer failure with optimization
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > ------- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-08-04 21:11 ------- > Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] member function pointer > failure with optimization > > So I would prefer if > you add those to the AGGREGATE_TYPE_P case instead of letting > it fall-through to the "default" case - we should probably add > some gcc_unreachable () to make sure we handled all cases. On a second thought this is probably not so good, but a /* Fallthrough. */ comment would be nice for the AGGREGATE_TYPE_P case. Thanks, Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37016
