------- Comment #3 from seppo at totalviewtech dot com  2008-07-23 18:46 -------

Hi Andrew, 

Sorry about the delay in response. We had some issues w/ installation and this
fell through the cracks. Anyways, I just tested gcc 4.2.3 and it fails the same
way as 4.1.1.

Thanks,
Seppo

XXXXXXXXXXX

> grep -A 3 -B 3 stupify gcc_4.2.3_dump.txt 
[49]    a4  0x00000004       0    0     SD       TC    0    0
[50]    m   0x20000c64     .data     1  unamex                    __strtollmax
[51]    a4  0x00000004       0    0     SD       TC    0    0
[52]    m   0x20000c68     .data     1  unamex                    stupify
[53]    a4  0x00000004       0    0     SD       TC    0    0
[54]    m   0x20000c6c     .data     1  unamex                    LC..1
[55]    a4  0x00000004       0    0     SD       TC    0    0
> grep -A 3 -B 3 stupify gcc_4.2.3_objdump.txt 
[262](sec  1)(fl 0x00)(ty   0)(scl 101) (nx 1) 0x00000138 .ef
AUX lnno 19 size 0x0 tagndx 0
[264](sec  1)(fl 0x00)(ty   0)(scl 143) (nx 0) 0x0000010d .bs
[265](sec -2)(fl 0x00)(ty   0)(scl 133) (nx 0) 0x00000000 stupify:S-10
[266](sec  1)(fl 0x00)(ty   0)(scl 144) (nx 0) 0x00000000 .es
[267](sec  1)(fl 0x00)(ty   0)(scl 107) (nx 1) 0x00000150 _filestatic.rw_
AUX val    33 prmhsh 0 snhsh 0 typ 1 algn 3 clss 1 stb 0 snstb 0
--
AUX val     4 prmhsh 0 snhsh 0 typ 1 algn 3 clss 5 stb 0 snstb 0
[283](sec  2)(fl 0x00)(ty   0)(scl 107) (nx 1) 0x000001a4 TOC
AUX val     0 prmhsh 0 snhsh 0 typ 1 algn 2 clss 15 stb 0 snstb 0
[285](sec  2)(fl 0x00)(ty   0)(scl 107) (nx 1) 0x000001a4 stupify
AUX val     4 prmhsh 0 snhsh 0 typ 1 algn 2 clss 3 stb 0 snstb 0
[287](sec  2)(fl 0x00)(ty   0)(scl 107) (nx 1) 0x000001a8 LC..1
AUX val     4 prmhsh 0 snhsh 0 typ 1 algn 2 clss 3 stb 0 snstb 0
chrome:/home/seppo/Bugs/Bug_10494 > 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


-- 

seppo at totalviewtech dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|4.1.1                       |4.2.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33740

Reply via email to