------- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2008-07-18 14:13 -------
Hmm, even that wouldn't restore the optimization.  The problem here is that
there is another access via b, like

   a <- b + c
   *b
   *(b + c)

The bad placement of the first assignment (bad because doing it the other way
round would have lower register pressure) in turn happens as soon as
gimplification.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36770

Reply via email to