------- Comment #4 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de  2008-05-07 09:51 
-------
It would be completely fine by me, if g++ simply emitted bogus warnings in a
consistent way. But the syntax is still confusing, and what seems quite
disconcerting to me is the fact that _both_ warnings disappear if I comment the
line 37214 (lpic[x][y].g = q.g;). Is this also expected behaviour?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36168

Reply via email to