------- Comment #4 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2008-05-07 09:51 ------- It would be completely fine by me, if g++ simply emitted bogus warnings in a consistent way. But the syntax is still confusing, and what seems quite disconcerting to me is the fact that _both_ warnings disappear if I comment the line 37214 (lpic[x][y].g = q.g;). Is this also expected behaviour?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36168
