------- Comment #44 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2008-04-21 14:13 ------- It is probably possible to generate the wrapper script atomically. But this solution can become ugly: on w32 we may generate also a wrapper executable.
I still don't see a convincing argument why you don't use -no-fast-install. If the problem is that you don't like the relink to happen at 'make install' time, then why don't you generate two 'ld' programs, one for installation and one for use uninstalled, with -no-fast-install, or even -no-install. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35752
