------- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-18 19:48 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35154.
> 

This does not contain the patch nor a pointer to the patch
that contains the offending code in comment #7.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35892

Reply via email to