------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-01 13:22 -------
Thanks for the report; the internal compiler error is definitely a compiler
bug. However, I believe the program is invalid.
If I read "2.8.3.3 private clause" in the OpenMP 2.5 specification correctly,
the items in the private(list) need to variables which are definable or
allocatable. However, "ONE" is not even a variable. Thus the program is
invalid. However, an error message such as the one of sunf95 should be given
instead of an ICE.
sunf95 writes:
!$OMP PARALLEL DO PRIVATE(I, ONE)
^
"dfff.f90", Line = 14, Column = 34: ERROR: Object ONE must be a variable to be
in the PRIVATE clause of the PARALLEL DO directive.
ifort writes:
!$OMP PARALLEL DO PRIVATE(I, ONE)
---------------------------------^
fortcom: Error: dfff.f90, line 14: Subobjects are not allowed in this OpenMP
clause; a named variable must be specified.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |diagnostic, ice-on-invalid-
| |code, openmp
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-04-01 13:22:13
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35786
