------- Comment #6 from rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk 2008-04-01 08:52 ------- Subject: Re: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010226-1.c:22: ICE: in do_output_reload, at reload1.c:7331
"dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I suppose the assumption in pa.md is that the scratch output reload >> should be in the same mode as the input operand. > > I think the constraint should be changed from "=&0" to "+&0" to indicate > that the operand is both read and written. Possibly, this will fix the > problem. Well, "=" is correct for matching operands; "+" isn't. As I say, the problem is simply that we have something that is logically an output value -- (scratch) -- but that does not have a mode. Changing "=" to "+" wouldn't solve that; the (scratch) would still be an output value. Richard -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35768
